↓ Skip to main content

Names, types, and distribution of neotropical species of Erythroxylum (Erythroxylaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Brittonia, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Names, types, and distribution of neotropical species of Erythroxylum (Erythroxylaceae)
Published in
Brittonia, January 2004
DOI 10.1663/0007-196x(2004)056[0001:ntadon]2.0.co;2
Authors

Timothy Plowman, Nancy Hensold

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Honduras 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 55%
Chemistry 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Brittonia
#78
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,648
of 133,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brittonia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them