| Title |
Annex to Quirke et al. Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: annotations of colorectal lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virchows Archiv, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00428-010-0997-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Vieth, Phil Quirke, René Lambert, Lawrence von Karsa, Mauro Risio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#420
of 1,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,537
of 101,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.