| Title |
Racial and Geographic Disparities in the Utilization of Surgical Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11605-007-0315-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Sonnenday, Justin B. Dimick, Richard D. Schulick, Michael A. Choti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 27% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#763
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,569
of 84,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.