↓ Skip to main content

Air pollution: The "heart" of the problem

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Air pollution: The "heart" of the problem
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/s11906-003-0008-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert D. Brook, Jeffrey R. Brook, Sanjay Rajagopalan

Abstract

Air pollution exposure is associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic cardiovascular mortality. Recent observations have implicated fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) as one of the most important pollutants. Inhalation of PM(2.5) causes acute pulmonary inflammation and oxidative stress. The subsequent generation of a systemic inflammatory response could link air pollution exposure with the development of cardiovascular disease. Human experiments have demonstrated pro-arrhythmic alterations in cardiac autonomic tone, increased blood pressure, higher serum C-reactive protein levels, and alterations in blood rheology favoring coagulation following controlled pollution exposures or in relation to elevated ambient PM(2.5) levels. Recent studies have also uncovered several harmful impacts on the systemic vasculature, including the triggering of acute vasoconstriction and the enhanced development of atherosclerosis. Many questions, however, remain unanswered and future studies will be required to clarify the relevant biologic mechanisms and to identify the specific constituents responsible for mediating the adverse health impacts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,299,308
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#147
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,119
of 130,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them