| Title |
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Native Americans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008554.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Sanjay Saint, Som Saha, A. Mark Fendrick, Keith Kelley, Scott D. Ramsey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,426
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,593
of 131,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#119
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.