↓ Skip to main content

A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
A Linear Optimal Transportation Framework for Quantifying and Visualizing Variations in Sets of Images
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11263-012-0566-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Wang, Dejan Slepčev, Saurav Basu, John A. Ozolek, Gustavo K. Rohde

Abstract

Transportation-based metrics for comparing images have long been applied to analyze images, especially where one can interpret the pixel intensities (or derived quantities) as a distribution of 'mass' that can be transported without strict geometric constraints. Here we describe a new transportation-based framework for analyzing sets of images. More specifically, we describe a new transportation-related distance between pairs of images, which we denote as linear optimal transportation (LOT). The LOT can be used directly on pixel intensities, and is based on a linearized version of the Kantorovich-Wasserstein metric (an optimal transportation distance, as is the earth mover's distance). The new framework is especially well suited for computing all pairwise distances for a large database of images efficiently, and thus it can be used for pattern recognition in sets of images. In addition, the new LOT framework also allows for an isometric linear embedding, greatly facilitating the ability to visualize discriminant information in different classes of images. We demonstrate the application of the framework to several tasks such as discriminating nuclear chromatin patterns in cancer cells, decoding differences in facial expressions, galaxy morphologies, as well as sub cellular protein distributions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 15 17%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 23 27%
Engineering 14 16%
Mathematics 9 10%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,941,350
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#371
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,214
of 168,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.