| Title |
The reliability of cause-of-death coding in The Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10654-010-9445-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Harteloh, Kim de Bruin, Jan Kardaun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 28% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,482,061
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#343
of 1,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,511
of 95,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.