↓ Skip to main content

Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Materials, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
17 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes
Published in
Clinical Materials, March 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Reza Abidian, David C. Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 264 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 27%
Researcher 48 17%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 103 37%
Materials Science 35 12%
Chemistry 30 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Physics and Astronomy 9 3%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 59 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,995
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#682
of 10,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,294
of 95,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.