↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Objective Measures of Adherence to HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Electronic Medication Monitors and Unannounced Pill Counts

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Comparing Objective Measures of Adherence to HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Electronic Medication Monitors and Unannounced Pill Counts
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, September 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011396711486
Authors

David R. Bangsberg, Frederick M. Hecht, Edwin D. Charlebois, Margaret Chesney, Andrew Moss

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Social Sciences 8 17%
Psychology 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,485
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,139
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them