↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: Physicians' Attitudes and Relationship With Self-reported Practices in 10 European Countries

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: Physicians' Attitudes and Relationship With Self-reported Practices in 10 European Countries
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, November 2000
DOI 10.1001/jama.284.19.2451
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marisa Rebagliato, Marina Cuttini, Lara Broggin, István Berbik, Umberto de Vonderweid, Gesine Hansen, Monique Kaminski, Louis A. A. Kollée, Audrũnas Kucinskas, Sylvie Lenoir, Adik Levin, Jan Persson, Margaret Reid, Rodolfo Saracci, for the EURONIC Study Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 47%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2006.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#19,154
of 36,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,620
of 40,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#56
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.