↓ Skip to main content

The special issue “Underground storage of CO2 and energy” in the framework of the 3rd Sino-German conference in May 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Geotechnica, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The special issue “Underground storage of CO2 and energy” in the framework of the 3rd Sino-German conference in May 2013
Published in
Acta Geotechnica, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11440-013-0243-6
Authors

Zhengmeng Hou, Heping Xie, Patrick Were

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 1 7%
France 1 7%
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 11 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Professor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Researcher 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 50%
Energy 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Acta Geotechnica
#17
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,490
of 193,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Geotechnica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them