| Title |
Sleep history is neglected diagnostic information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02598994 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward F. Haponik, Ann W. Frye, Boyd Richards, Antoinette Wymer, Ann Hinds, Kevin Pearce, Vaughn McCall, Joseph Konen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 47% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,427
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,855
of 92,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.