↓ Skip to main content

The impact of outpatient rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
The impact of outpatient rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neurology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00415-002-0778-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Patti, Maria Rita Ciancio, Ester Reggio, Rossella Lopes, Filippo Palermo, Manuela Cacopardo, Arturo Reggio

Abstract

It is well accepted that rehabilitative treatment can be effective in reducing disability and optimizing quality of life (QoL) of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitative treatment on QoL in patients suffering from MS. We selected 111 patients from a sample of 407 patients who had consecutively entered the MS Center of Catania (which is located in southern Italy) in 1998. Fifty-eight were randomly assigned to the study treatment and 53 to a waiting list (control treatment). Kurtzke's EDSS and quality of Life (QoL)were the primary endpoints. QoL was measured with the generic multi-item SF-36 scales. We also used: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for depression, the Tempelaar Social Experience Check-list (SET) for social activities and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS). The study treatment group was treated for 6 consecutive weeks, 6 days a week with a comprehensive rehabilitative outpatient model. The control treatment group was in a waiting list and was trained to self-exercises at home. EDSS remained unchanged in both groups. All health related QoL domains significantly improved in the study treatment (p < 0.001 in physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, and social functioning; p < 0.05 in vitality, role emotional and mental health). FIS, SET and BDI also improved significantly after the rehabilitative treatment in the study group (p < 0.001). The results of this study confirm the effectiveness of a short comprehensive outpatient model of rehabilitative treatment in people with MS and in particular in their QoL.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 30%
Psychology 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,457
of 4,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,205
of 241,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#18
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.