You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hitting the target and missing the point: target‐based conservation planning in context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00042.x |
| Authors |
Josie Carwardine, Carissa J. Klein, Kerrie A. Wilson, Robert L. Pressey, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Curaçao | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 7 | 1% |
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 421 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 112 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 194 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,076,173
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#566
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,061
of 188,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.