↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Regression in Autism: Maternal Perception

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Developmental Regression in Autism: Maternal Perception
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1005403421141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Davidovitch, Lilach Glick, Gabriela Holtzman, Emanuel Tirosh, Marilyn P. Safir

Abstract

Developmental regression among children with autism is a common phenomenon of unknown origin. The purpose of this study was to identify the differences between children with autism who reportedly regressed with those who did not regress. A representative group of 39 mothers were interviewed (40 children--1 pair of twin girls) about familial, pregnancy, perinatal, as well as medical history and developmental milestones. The study focused on mothers' perceptions of developmental regression. Nineteen children (47.5%) regressed in verbal and nonverbal communication and social but not in motor abilities. Mean age of regression was 24 months, with 11 children who regressed before and 8 after this age. No significant differences were reported by mothers of children who did or did not regress. More mothers of children who regressed, than those of children who did not, expressed guilt feelings regarding the development of autism, and almost all of them had an "explanation" for the possible mechanisms that might have influenced their children's developmental course. In conclusion, developmental regression in our population appears to be a typical event in the natural course of autism. There is little difference between those children who regressed and those who did not regress in maternal perceptions and reports of development, family, and medical history.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 25%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2011.
All research outputs
#4,215,606
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,682
of 5,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,578
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them