| Title |
Meeting the nutritional needs of elderly residents in aged-care: Are we doing enough?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0042-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Iuliano, A. Olden, J. Woods |
| Abstract |
Institutionalized elderly are at high risk of malnutrition, including those residing in low-level aged-care and able to self-feed. We used comprehensive dietary intake assessments to determine the nutritional adequacy of food served to residents and if food waste contributed to insufficient nutrient intakes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,219,839
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,666
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,902
of 207,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.