↓ Skip to main content

Effective team work in health care: A review of issues discussed in recent research literature

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Analysis, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Effective team work in health care: A review of issues discussed in recent research literature
Published in
Health Care Analysis, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02678456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Opie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Analysis
#133
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,449
of 30,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them