↓ Skip to main content

Lack of efficacy of fluoxetine in recurrent brief depression and suicidal attempts

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Lack of efficacy of fluoxetine in recurrent brief depression and suicidal attempts
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02190400
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. B. Montgomery, A. Roberts, M. Green, T. Bullock, D. Baldwin, S. A. Montgomery

Abstract

Recurrent brief depression (RBD) fulfills DSM-III-R symptom criteria for major depression but the episodes are of shorter duration than the 2 weeks required by DSM-III-R. The clinical importance of the disorder has been observed in prophylactic studies of suicidal behavior. The possibility that antidepressants with selective action on the reuptake of serotonin might be effective in preventing recurrences of brief depression has been investigated. Fluoxetine in a dose of 120 mg a week, administered biweekly, had no effect on the recurrence rate, which was maintained at approximately the same rate on fluoxetine (1 every 18.7 days) as with placebo (1 every 17.6 days). In a group of patients with two or more prior episodes of suicidal behavior, there were 18 attempted suicides in the 54 patients treated with fluoxetine and the same number in the 53 patients treated with placebo. Fluoxetine neither raised nor lowered the suicide attempt rate as compared with placebo, providing no evidence to support the drug's role in either suicide provocation or prevention. Since fluoxetine is clearly effective with recurrent major depression, it would appear that recurrent brief depression has a different pharmacology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,263,401
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#117
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#707
of 23,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them