↓ Skip to main content

Interpersonal problem solving and parasuicide

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Therapy and Research, February 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Interpersonal problem solving and parasuicide
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research, February 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01183128
Authors

Marsha M. Linehan, Paul Camper, John A. Chiles, Kirk Strosahl, Edward Shearin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 4 8%
Other 14 29%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 61%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#416
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,847
of 46,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Therapy and Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.