| Title |
Effect of physician profiling on utilization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02599025 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Andrew Balas, Suzanne Austin Boren, Gordon D. Brown, Bernard G. Ewigman, Joyce A. Mitchell, Gerald T. Perkoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,757,291
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,048
of 8,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,147
of 28,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.