↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Age on the Efficacy of Newer Adjuvant Therapies in Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Findings From the ACCENT Database

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Age on the Efficacy of Newer Adjuvant Therapies in Patients With Stage II/III Colon Cancer: Findings From the ACCENT Database
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2013
DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.49.6638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine J. McCleary, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, Erin Green, Greg Yothers, Aimery de Gramont, Eric Van Cutsem, Michael O'Connell, Christopher J. Twelves, Leonard B. Saltz, Daniel G. Haller, Daniel J. Sargent

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that patients with stage II/III colon cancer receive similar benefit from intravenous (IV) fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy regardless of age. Combination regimens and oral fluorouracil (FU) therapy are now standard. We examined the impact of age on colon cancer recurrence and mortality after adjuvant therapy with these newer options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 14%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,735,419
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#4,228
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,392
of 207,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#48
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.