↓ Skip to main content

The haemostatic effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) used as a volume expander

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The haemostatic effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) used as a volume expander
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00273540
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Macintyre, I. J. Mackie, D. Ho, J. Tinker, C. Bullen, S. J. Machin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 9%
Germany 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Chemistry 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,861
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,086
of 42,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.