You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Delta‐Flux: An Eddy Covariance Network for a Climate‐Smart Lower Mississippi Basin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agricultural & Environmental Letters, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.2134/ael2017.01.0003 |
Authors |
Benjamin R. K. Runkle, James R. Rigby, Michele L. Reba, Saseendran S. Anapalli, Joydeep Bhattacharjee, Ken W. Krauss, Lu Liang, Martin A. Locke, Kimberly A. Novick, Ruixiu Sui, Kosana Suvočarev, Paul M. White |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 40% |
Canada | 2 | 20% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 26% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
Engineering | 4 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,239,802
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Environmental Letters
#80
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,440
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Environmental Letters
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them