↓ Skip to main content

Checklist determinanten van innovaties in gezondheidszorgorganisaties

Overview of attention for article published in TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 133)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Checklist determinanten van innovaties in gezondheidszorgorganisaties
Published in
TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/bf03089541
Authors

Margot Fleuren, Karin Wiefferink, Theo Paulussen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 29%
Social Sciences 3 21%
Psychology 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen
#39
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,826
of 171,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them