↓ Skip to main content

Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: Current concepts from a critical review of literature

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: Current concepts from a critical review of literature
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, September 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2006.07.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bill Vicenzino, Aatit Paungmali, Pamela Teys

Abstract

There are an increasing number of reports espousing the clinically beneficial effects of Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement (MWM) treatment techniques. The most frequent reported effect is that of an immediate and substantial pain reduction accompanied by improved function. Prompted by these dramatic effects are questions regarding the mechanism(s) of action that underpins MWM. It appears timely that a review of the current literature is performed to synthesize and evaluate claims of the effectiveness of MWM and speculation about the proposed mechanisms of action. This article provides an overview of the literature concerning the clinical efficacy, effects and putative mechanisms of action of the MWM approach in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. The literature regarding the mechanisms of action in both the biomechanical and pain science paradigms is covered herein by reviewing all available scientific evidence from laboratory-based studies. Limitations of reported studies and directions for further research are also considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 577 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 127 21%
Student > Bachelor 113 19%
Student > Postgraduate 64 11%
Other 54 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 9%
Other 109 18%
Unknown 85 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 245 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 120 20%
Sports and Recreations 75 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Other 36 6%
Unknown 96 16%