| Title |
Increasing genetic diversity by participatory varietal selection in high potential production systems in Nepal and India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1017599307498 |
| Authors |
J.R. Witcombe, K.D. Joshi, R.B. Rana, D.S. Virk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#193
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,667
of 132,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.