↓ Skip to main content

Strategic and Financial Performance Implications of Global Sourcing Strategy: A Contingency Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Strategic and Financial Performance Implications of Global Sourcing Strategy: A Contingency Analysis
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, March 1995
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490171
Authors

Janet Y. Murray, Masaaki Kotabe, Albert R. Wildt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 19 16%
Lecturer 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 66 56%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 8%
Engineering 8 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2006.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#333
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,537
of 24,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them