| Title |
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-84 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moriah E Ellen, Gregory Léon, Gisèle Bouchard, John N Lavis, Mathieu Ouimet, Jeremy M Grimshaw |
| Abstract |
Decisions regarding health systems are sometimes made without the input of timely and reliable evidence, leading to less than optimal health outcomes. Healthcare organizations can implement tools and infrastructures to support the use of research evidence to inform decision-making. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 25% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 48 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Psychology | 20 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,700,721
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#858
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,085
of 208,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.