↓ Skip to main content

Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Phonological and visual processing deficits can dissociate in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from two case studies
Published in
Reading and Writing, September 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1025501406971
Authors

Sylviane Valdois, Marie-Line Bosse, B. Ans, S. Carbonnel, Michel Zorman, D. David, Jacques Pellat

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Linguistics 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#271
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,837
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them