↓ Skip to main content

Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes?

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Acquisition of reading and written spelling in a transparent orthography: Two non parallel processes?
Published in
Reading and Writing, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01026945
Authors

Giuseppe Cossu, Maria Gugliotta, John C. Marshall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 49%
Linguistics 6 12%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#243
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,801
of 25,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them