↓ Skip to main content

Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
Title
Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10457-007-9075-4
Authors

E. L. Dossa, E. C. M. Fernandes, W. S. Reid, K. Ezui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 254 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 21%
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 39%
Environmental Science 81 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 48 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#240
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,728
of 58,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them