↓ Skip to main content

An Empirical Investigation of Social Bonds and Juvenile Delinquency in Hong Kong

Overview of attention for article published in Child & Youth Care Forum, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
An Empirical Investigation of Social Bonds and Juvenile Delinquency in Hong Kong
Published in
Child & Youth Care Forum, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10566-012-9172-z
Authors

Wing Hong Chui, Heng Choon Oliver Chan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 32%
Psychology 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Child & Youth Care Forum
#162
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,409
of 248,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child & Youth Care Forum
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.