You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public Engagement in Health Priority Setting in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Current Trends and Considerations for Policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS Medicine, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001495 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katarzyna Bolsewicz Alderman, David Hipgrave, Eliana Jimenez-Soto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Spain | 3 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
Egypt | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 79% |
Scientists | 5 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,165,251
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,702
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,766
of 208,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#38
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.