↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40262-013-0098-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sameer Doshi, Wojciech Krzyzanski, Susan Yue, Steven Elliott, Andrew Chow, Juan José Pérez-Ruixo

Abstract

The cloning of the EPO gene in the early 1980s allowed for the development of recombinant erythropoietins and analogues [erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)], offering an alternative to transfusion as a method of raising haemoglobin (Hb) levels, which have been used for more than 20 years to treat anaemia in millions of anaemic patients. There are now a number of ESAs available worldwide for the treatment of anaemia, approved for different routes of administration (intravenous and subcutaneous) and dosing intervals (three times weekly, weekly, biweekly and monthly). In this review, we discuss the pharmacokinetic characteristics, including absorption, distribution and elimination processes, across the different ESAs. Incomplete and slow lymphatic absorption, with limited extravascular distribution, and minor contributions of the target-mediated drug disposition to the overall elimination are the common characteristics across the marketed ESA. Additionally, we assess the similarities and differences of ESAs related to pharmacodynamics in the context of the different biomarkers used to monitor the magnitude and duration of the effect, and introduce the concept of the minimum effective concentration of the ESA. The relationship between the minimum effective concentration and the half-life suggests that the time during which drug concentrations are above the minimum effective concentration is the main determinant of ESA efficacy in increasing Hb levels. The tolerance phenomenon and its physiological mechanism and implications for ESA dosing are discussed. Finally, the areas of future clinical pharmacology research are envisioned.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,691,082
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#1,106
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,067
of 198,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.