↓ Skip to main content

Endosulfan poisoning and chronic brain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, October 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Endosulfan poisoning and chronic brain syndrome
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, October 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf00695875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dov R. Aleksandrowicz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Other 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#962
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,533
of 6,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.