↓ Skip to main content

Less Efficacious Conditioned Pain Modulation and Sensory Hypersensitivity in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders in Singapore

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical journal of pain, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Less Efficacious Conditioned Pain Modulation and Sensory Hypersensitivity in Chronic Whiplash-associated Disorders in Singapore
Published in
Clinical journal of pain, May 2014
DOI 10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182a03940
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tze Siong Ng, Ashley Pedler, Bill Vicenzino, Michele Sterling

Abstract

Cultural differences in pain perception exist. Although chronic whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) is well investigated in western countries, little is known about its presentation in Singapore. We studied the neck motion and pain sensitivity in people with chronic WAD in Singapore.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 22%
Psychology 5 5%
Unspecified 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical journal of pain
#1,599
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,366
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical journal of pain
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.