↓ Skip to main content

Production of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates by Human Macrophages Exposed to Soot Particles and Asbestos Fibers and Increase in NF-kappa B p50/p105 mRNA

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Production of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates by Human Macrophages Exposed to Soot Particles and Asbestos Fibers and Increase in NF-kappa B p50/p105 mRNA
Published in
Lung, November 1999
DOI 10.1007/pl00007652
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Oettinger, K. Drumm, M. Knorst, P. Krinyak, R. Smolarski, K. Kienast

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2001.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#283
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,675
of 36,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them