You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring Multidisciplinary Team Effectiveness in a Ward‐Based Healthcare Setting: Development of the Team Functioning Assessment Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Healthcare Quality: Promoting Excellence in Healthcare, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00138.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gigi Sutton, Jenny Liao, Nerina L. Jimmieson, Simon Lloyd D. Restubog |
| Abstract |
Nontechnical skills relating to team functioning are vital to the effective delivery of patient care and safety. In this study, we develop a reliable behavioral marker tool for assessing nontechnical skills that are critical to the success of ward-based multidisciplinary healthcare teams. The Team Functioning Assessment Tool (TFAT) was developed and refined using a literature review, focus groups, card-sorting exercise, field observations, and final questionnaire evaluation and refinement process. Results demonstrated that Clinical Planning, Executive Tasks, and Team Relations are important facets of effective multidisciplinary healthcare team functioning. The TFAT was also shown to yield acceptable inter-rater agreement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 26% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Healthcare Quality: Promoting Excellence in Healthcare
#281
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,625
of 120,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Healthcare Quality: Promoting Excellence in Healthcare
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.