↓ Skip to main content

Anxiety, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviour: Insights Directly from Young People with ASD

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Anxiety, Intolerance of Uncertainty and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviour: Insights Directly from Young People with ASD
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3027-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Joyce, Emma Honey, Susan R. Leekam, Sarah L. Barrett, Jacqui Rodgers

Abstract

In order to investigate the experience of anxiety and restricted and repetitive behaviours (RRB) in young people with ASD, 19 families with young people with ASD aged between 13 and 20 years completed questionnaire measures of RRB, anxiety, and intolerance of uncertainty. Ten young people also completed a novel semi-structured interview exploring an individualised example of an RRB. Findings demonstrated that young people with ASD can self-report and show insight in to their RRB, and replicated previous findings based on parent report showing a significant positive relationship between RRB and anxiety. This is the first evidence of young person self-report using both quantitative and qualitative data and indicates a range of reasons why young people may engage in RRB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 39%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 68 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,964,666
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#864
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,943
of 314,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#18
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.