↓ Skip to main content

Podcasting: a technology, not a toy

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Podcasting: a technology, not a toy
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10459-012-9361-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan White, Nishan Sharma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 12 33%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Social Sciences 10 28%
Psychology 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#666
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,616
of 176,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.