You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of cardioprotective therapy for prevention of cardiotoxicity with chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cancer (1965), May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kashif Kalam, Thomas H. Marwick |
| Abstract |
Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognised complication of chemotherapy with anthracycline and/or trastuzumab, and its prevention remains an important challenge in cancer survivorship. Several successful preventative strategies have been identified in animal trials. We sought to assemble the clinical evidence that prophylactic pharmacological interventions could prevent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure in patients undergoing chemotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 63 | 22% |
| Unknown | 73 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 48% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#2,522
of 6,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,537
of 208,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cancer (1965)
#21
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.