You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Decreased gut microbiota diversity, delayed Bacteroidetes colonisation and reduced Th1 responses in infants delivered by Caesarean section
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gut, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303249 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hedvig E Jakobsson, Thomas R Abrahamsson, Maria C Jenmalm, Keith Harris, Christopher Quince, Cecilia Jernberg, Bengt Björkstén, Lars Engstrand, Anders F Andersson |
Abstract |
The early intestinal microbiota exerts important stimuli for immune development, and a reduced microbial exposure as well as caesarean section (CS) has been associated with the development of allergic disease. Here we address how microbiota development in infants is affected by mode of delivery, and relate differences in colonisation patterns to the maturation of a balanced Th1/Th2 immune response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
Chile | 3 | 7% |
South Africa | 2 | 5% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 978 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | <1% |
Canada | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 951 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 155 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 154 | 16% |
Student > Master | 131 | 13% |
Researcher | 119 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 5% |
Other | 141 | 14% |
Unknown | 228 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 210 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 153 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 104 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 88 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 4% |
Other | 123 | 13% |
Unknown | 257 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#167,361
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#105
of 7,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,022
of 211,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.