↓ Skip to main content

Subjective Social Status and Self-Reported Health Among US-born and Immigrant Latinos

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Subjective Social Status and Self-Reported Health Among US-born and Immigrant Latinos
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0346-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremiah R. Garza, Beth A. Glenn, Rashmita S. Mistry, Ninez A. Ponce, Frederick J. Zimmerman

Abstract

Subjective social status is associated with a range of health outcomes. Few studies have tested the relevance of subjective social status among Latinos in the U.S.; those that have yielded mixed results. Data come from the Latino subsample of the 2003 National Latino and Asian American Study (N = 2554). Regression models adjusted for socioeconomic and demographic factors. Stratified analyses tested whether nativity status modifies the effect of subjective social status on health. Subjective social status was associated with better health. Income and education mattered more for health than subjective social status among U.S.-born Latinos. However, the picture was mixed among immigrant Latinos, with subjective social status more strongly predictive than income but less so than education. Subjective social status may tap into stressful immigrant experiences that affect one's perceived self-worth and capture psychosocial consequences and social disadvantage left out by conventional socioeconomic measures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 25%
Psychology 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#21,376,200
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#1,168
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,584
of 301,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.