| Title |
The ETHICA study (part I): elderly’s thoughts about intensive care unit admission for life-sustaining treatments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2976-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Philippart, A. Vesin, C. Bruel, A. Kpodji, B. Durand-Gasselin, P. Garçon, M. Levy-Soussan, J. L. Jagot, N. Calvo-Verjat, J. F. Timsit, B. Misset, M. Garrouste-Orgeas |
| Abstract |
To assess preferences among individuals aged ≥80 years for a future hypothetical critical illness requiring life-sustaining treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,166,365
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,620
of 5,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,896
of 201,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.