| Title |
The combined therapy myo-inositol plus d-chiro-inositol, rather than d-chiro-inositol, is able to improve IVF outcomes: results from a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-013-2855-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Colazingari, Mariangela Treglia, Robert Najjar, Arturo Bevilacqua |
| Abstract |
The present study aims to investigate the effects of the combined therapy myo-inositol (MI) plus D-chiro-inositol (DCI) or D-chiro-inositol treatment in oocyte quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 75% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,497,867
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#54
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,643
of 196,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.