| Title |
Do frogs really eat cardamom? Understanding the myth of crop damage by amphibians in the Western Ghats, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-017-0908-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arun Kanagavel, Sethu Parvathy, Nithula Nirmal, Nithin Divakar, Rajeev Raghavan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,577,600
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#473
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,300
of 324,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.