Title |
Caffeine in tea Camellia sinensis — Content, absorption, benefits and risks of consumption
|
---|---|
Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0404-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Gramza-Michałowska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,173,443
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#885
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,052
of 324,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.