↓ Skip to main content

Ionization and Henry’s law constants for volatile, weak electrolyte water pollutants

Overview of attention for article published in Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Ionization and Henry’s law constants for volatile, weak electrolyte water pollutants
Published in
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, March 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02697525
Authors

Ki-Pung Yoo, Soo Yong Lee, Won Hong Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2006.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#64
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,899
of 10,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them