↓ Skip to main content

Dengue virus NS1 protein activates immune cells via TLR4 but not TLR2 or TLR6

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology & Cell Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dengue virus NS1 protein activates immune cells via TLR4 but not TLR2 or TLR6
Published in
Immunology & Cell Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/icb.2017.5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naphak Modhiran, Daniel Watterson, Antje Blumenthal, Alan G Baxter, Paul R Young, Katryn J Stacey

Abstract

The secreted hexameric form of the dengue virus (DENV) non-structural protein 1 (NS1) has recently been shown to elicit inflammatory cytokine release and disrupt endothelial cell monolayer integrity. This suggests that circulating NS1 contributes to the vascular leak that plays a major role in the pathology of dengue haemorrhagic fever and shock. Pathways activated by NS1 are thus of great interest as potential therapeutic targets. Recent works have separately implicated both toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and the TLR2/6 heterodimer in immune cell activation by NS1. Here we have used mouse gene knockout macrophages and antibodies blocking TLR function in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to show that recombinant NS1, expressed and purified from eukaryotic cells, induces cytokine production via TLR4 but not TLR2/6. Furthermore, the commercial Escherichia coli-derived recombinant NS1 preparation used in other work to implicate TLR2/6 in the response is not correctly folded and appears to be contaminated by several microbial TLR ligands. Thus TLR4 remains a therapeutic target for DENV infections, with TLR4 antagonists holding promise for the treatment of dengue disease.Immunology and Cell Biology advance online publication, 21 February 2017; doi:10.1038/icb.2017.5.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 35 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Immunology & Cell Biology
#1,687
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,126
of 323,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology & Cell Biology
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.