↓ Skip to main content

An Anatomical Classification – a New Paradigm for Management of Urinary Dysfunction in the Female

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
An Anatomical Classification – a New Paradigm for Management of Urinary Dysfunction in the Female
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 1999
DOI 10.1007/pl00004010
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. E. Papa Petros, U. Ulmsten

Abstract

A new classification specifies anatomical defects in the anterior, middle and posterior zones of the vagina as causing urinary dysfunction. An external musculoelastic mechanism stretches the vagina to open and close the outflow tract. The same pelvic floor muscles provide a peripheral control mechanism for micturition. The stretched vagina prevents the filling bladder from activating the stretch receptors. Vaginal laxity may weaken the transmission of muscle forces, interfering with the mechanical process of opening and closure. Laxity may also destabilize the peripheral control mechanism, a neurological process, causing bladder control to swing between the open and closed modes, i.e. bladder instability. Specific symptoms, signs and urodynamic tests were arranged into a pictorial algorithm as a practical guide for locating the three zones of anatomical defects. It was possible to reinterpret almost all the definitions and descriptions of the International Continence Society in terms of this classification, and to explain how vaginal laxity may cause premature activation of the micturition reflex (detrusor instability), stress incontinence and abnormal emptying (dribble, overflow). This convergence in anatomical and urodynamic (ICS) concepts explains many previously unexplained phenomena, and potentially opens up an entirely new approach to management, non-surgical strengthening of specific ligaments, or surgical reinforcement thereof with ambulatory 'keyhole' methods which do not require catheterization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#888
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,692
of 102,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them